Home

Advertisement

enchanted_pants [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Be "The Bomb"

[ about me | vital statistics ]
[ old stuff | past entries to this journal ]
[ house rules | for reading & commenting ]

Links
[Links:| D.I.L. M.L.R.L. E.R.D. E.L.E. G.A.K. J.A.V.A. M.R.N. S.L.H.F. C.M.C. ]

Helpless [Jan. 12th, 2010|06:42 pm]
"Wars would be a lot better, I think, if guys would say to themselves sometimes 'Jesus — I'm not going to do that to the enemy. That's too much.' "
- Kurt Vonnegut, Happy Birthday, Wanda June


I learned today, hours ago, that an old friend from college was seriously injured in the December 30 suicide bombing in Afghanistan. He is currently recovering in Bethesda Naval Hospital with an assortment of terrible injuries, although reports from the family indicate that he is making good progress so far.

I'm ashamed to say that I had to do a little online research to confirm that the bombing in question is the same one that killed eight CIA agents, earning widespread notoriety. At the time I originally heard about this bombing, I admit that the news didn't affect me much. I probably shook my head, sighed, avoided reading any of the details.

Eight deaths did not move the needle, until I found out my friend was one of the lucky ones. On the surface of my brain, in my peripheral vision, eight deaths has become nothing. It's a quarter of a Tarantino movie. It's the last segment of This Week with George Stephanopolous, the one I always fast-forward through. It's another Wednesday morning in Afghanistan. Do I avoid thinking about it because I'm self-absorbed? Desensitized? Helpless?

The phrase "suicide bombing" is a perversion, an abortion of humanity. Every day, it seems, a poor and undereducated young person prepares to kill himself and as many as hundreds of other people in the name of dogmatic warfare. But are these men really warriors, or are they weapons -- low-tech drones operated by so-called holy men with dreams of pious totalitarianism? What turns a man into an instrument of death? What would make anyone want to kill my friend -- who has a beautiful wife and a three-year old daughter and the quickest laugh-trigger I've ever seen? Is it anger? Ignorance? Helplessness?

And the U.S. marches forward, playing whac-a-mole in the desert. We cannot retreat, lest the threat advance. And we cannot escalate, lest we risk greater losses. And we cannot stand still, lest we sink in the sand. So we barter and negotiate, overture and undermine, yell and whisper. And we only get closer to these fundamental questions: how do you win a war? Why do we fight? Are we righteous? Deluded? Helpless?

All I can do now is shake my head, sigh, and wait for more details. Because of my friend, and Americans like him, I am safer. But I don't really feel any safer. So what have I gained? What have we bought?

I feel a deep sense of gratitude to our fallen soldiers. I have sincere pity for our beseiged leaders. I hope and wish for my friend's full and fast recovery. But I remain helpless.
LinkVent your spleen

Burying the lede [Aug. 27th, 2009|03:39 pm]
"Down, down, down into the darkness of the grave gently they go, the beautiful, the tender, the kind; quietly they go, the intelligent, the witty, the brave. I know. But I do not approve. And I am not resigned.
- Edna St. Vincent Millay"


Death brings me out of hiding today. No, not the passing of the late Senator Edward Kennedy, my shirt-tail relative, though I hope he's enjoying a nice Irish coffee in the sky.

No, in the past two months I've been confronted with two deaths that hit slightly closer to home. One, a 35-year old professional acquaintance, and the other, a college classmate with whom I was marginally familiar. Two ostensibly intelligent, reasonably young and presumably vibrant individuals, gone.

At first this news made me sad, not just sympathetically, for theiir families, etc., but personally -- in that I am getting to the age where it's not totally ridiculous that my peers might be dropping dead, or by induction, myself.

Then it made me curious. What did they die of? Was there an accident, or a disease? Was it a common disease, a familiar villain? Or was it a rare, predatory medical mystery? Was it sudden and dramatic, or slow and emotional? Was it contageous? Could I get it? Might I have it? Can it be stopped?

But nowhere was I able to find this information. Not in the official obituaries, or related news briefs, or the funeral home guestbook pages. All these reports were frustratingly, intentionally vague.

Which made me angry. And I got stuck there, in the middle of a Kübler-Ross jumble. Why don't people include the cause of death in their death announcements?

C.C., the Official Mortality Expert of Enchanted Pants, informed me that "it's generally not relevant. And usually you can figure it out by the charity of choice."

The second reason is not applicable. And the first reason is baloney. Not relevant? If you're going to say that someone died, you should at least mention how it happened. This is a basic tenet of journalism, to say nothing of common courtesy. Announcing a death without mentioning the cause of death is like reporting who won the football game but declining to tell the score. ("The Giants lost today. They leave behind 50,000 angry drunks.")

C.C. held fast. "I think the assumption generally is that the people to whom it would really matter would know already."

This is not an acceptable excuse either, for the self-evident reason that it matters to me. It may not be important to them that I know ("them" being the deceased or his/her survivors), and I can accept their desire for privacy. But if the announcement is only for people who are already "in the know," then why make the announcement public? And if it doesn't "matter" to anyone else, then why hide it?

The whole approach is blatantly ambiguous, calling attention to the unspoken.

Then C.C. tried to shut me up by going deep and philosophical. "I think obituaries are considered more about the life than the death."

But that doesn't make any sense, either. How a story ends is usually an important part of the story, isn't it? In A Tale of Two Cities, would readers have been satisfied if Sydney Carton had inexplicably died in his jail cell? Or if The Great Gatsby simply passed away on Page 64, leaving Nick and Daisy alone with their upper-class ennui? Here, in real life, Michael Jackson died a month ago, after we watched him erode into a cadaver for the last twenty years, and people (by which I mean viewers of CNN Headline News) still want to know what the fuck happened.

Obituaries are about the life and the death, because the death is a part of life. (You know, the very last part.) People deserve to know how the story ends.

Instead, people choose to be mysterious. Instead of using the occasion to promote [disease] awareness, or even [accident] prevention, they indulge in their little secrets like 12-year old girls. How bad could it really be? And is keeping it quiet worth infuriating the rest of us?

It's almost as if they don't care about my feelings.

Or they want me to use my imagination.

So, for those of you who might eventually die, or who might be entrusted with the estate of a loved one, heed this: from now on, if I read an obituary that doesn't list a cause of death, I'm just going to assume that the deceased was crushed by a vending machine.

There's no moral judgment there, no real shame in it, but it's just graceless enough to be embarassing. Plus it will ward me away from vending machines.

So, rest in peace, dearly departed. Wherever you are, I hope there are plenty of Twix.
LinkVent your spleen

Annual Baseball Predictions and Predilections [Apr. 5th, 2009|05:53 pm]
"When the number of factors coming into play in a phenomenological complex is too large scientific method in most cases fails. One need only think of the weather, in which case the prediction even for a few days ahead is impossible."
- Albert Einstein (Physicist and Madcap Genius)


Prediction/
Key Question

AL EAST
Tampa Bay Rays
A lot of guys actually underperformed offensively last year. Can Evan Longoria match his solid rookie campaign?

New York Yankees
80 percent of A-Rod should be good enough to fill out the lineup. But will a suspect defense be able to support their $100M pitching staff?

Boston Red Sox
Lots of depth on the pitching staff, not so much in the lineup. How much do their aging batsmen (Papi, Lowell, Drew) have in the tank?

Baltimore Orioles
The offense and the defense should actually be pretty good. The pitching staff just needs to throw strikes. Can they?

Toronto Blue Jays
Probably a lost season, with young hitters maturing and young pitchers recovering on the DL. Can Roy Halladay pitch three times a week?

AL CENTRAL
Cleveland Indians
The lineup should score runs, but the pitching staff looks light without Sabathia. Can Fausto Carmona bounce back enough to negate Clif Lee's inevitable regression?

Minnesota Twins
There's a lot of replacement-level talent here surrounding four or five elite players. Will Mauer and Baker -- two of those elite -- get back from the DL in time to save their season?

Chicago White Sox
The aging offense is bound to fade. Can Ozzie Guillen once again perform alchemy with a no-name pitching staff?

Detroit Tigers This past offseason, the team traded some offense for a little more defense. Can Justin Verlander right his own ship and lead a patchwork pitching staff?

Kansas City Royals
Their offseason improvements were mostly cosmetic. Will they have enough men on base for the free-swinging muscle in the lineup?


AL WEST
Los Angeles Angels
The pitching staff is held together with band-aids and scotch tape. When the starters are on the field, they should be fine, but can a slap-hitting offense carry the team when they're not?

Texas Rangers
Scoring runs will never be a problem in Arlington, but preventing runs is still an issue. Will the young arms graduate to the majors ahead of schedule?

Seattle Mariners
Pitching and defense should be fine, but questionable roster construction yields a lineup without many attractive options. Will Jeff Clement and Wladimir Balentien perform when they're eventually recalled to the majors?

Oakland Athletics
The offense is better, but now the defense is worse. How much can you really expect from such a young pitching staff? (Ask the 2008 Yankees.)

NL EAST
New York Mets
More depth in the lineup and the bullpen than last year, but their window is slowly closing. Will the back of the rotation give them anything at all?

Florida Marlins A strong young rotation is backed by the majors' best player. But who else in the lineup can hit 30 homers? Anyone?

Atlanta Braves
The totally renovated pitching staff will have to carry the load on a roster with little margin for error. Can Jeff Francouer save his career?

Philadelphia Phillies
Didn't improve anywhere on the diamond and regression is likely for some key members of the championship squad. Will Cole Hamels' arm hold up for another long year?

Washington Nationals
Remarkably similar in design to their Beltway neighbors, except with a much lower ceiling. How will Manny Acta divide up the playing time at OF/1B?

NL CENTRAL
Chicago Cubs
Still have more depth and talent than anyone else in the division. Between injuries and plain old performance, will they get enough innings and production from their outfield?

Cincinnati Reds
They have a couple strong young pieces in the rotation and a couple strong young pieces in the lineup. Can Dusty Baker work his magic with the team's proletariat without wearing out his elites?

St. Louis Cardinals
One great hitter, a halfway decent pitching staff and a good defense can carry a team a long way. (See: late-90s and early-aughts San Francisco Giants.) Will their defense be "good" enough?

Milwaukee Brewers
Gallardo is good, but he can't replace two departed ace pitchers. Can the offense pick up the slack by hitting better on the road and against righties?

Houston Astros The good players are very, very good, but the bad players are truly rotten. Do they start selling off pieces at the break?

Pittsburgh Pirates Like the Astros, except they don't have any really good players. Will the kids provide any optimism when they're called up in the second half?

NL WEST
Los Angeles Dodgers
This team is younger than you think. What will break down first: Manny's will or his body?

Colorado Rockies
As usual, it all comes down to pitching, but this time they're looking to high-ceiling youngsters instead of high-priced veterans. Is this Ubaldo Jimenez's breakout year?

Arizona Diamondbacks
The pitching staff should be great, but the offense is unproven. Will the young hitters actually start hitting?

San Francisco Giants
The pitching staff should be great, but the offense could be historically bad. Will anyone step up at the plate?

San Diego Padres
They looked overmatched last year and spun their wheels this offseason. Where will Peavy be in August?

WORLD SERIES PREDICTION: Tampa Bay Rays over Los Angeles Dodgers


Predilections
From most-favorite to least-favorite

Oakland Athletics
Pittsburgh Pirates
Milwaukee Brewers
Tampa Bay Rays
Minnesota Twins
Detroit Tigers
Philadelphia Phillies
Kansas City Royals
Cleveland Indians
Washington Nationals
Chicago Cubs
San Diego Padres
St. Louis Cardinals
Atlanta Braves
Los Angeles Dodgers
Cincinnati Reds
Baltimore Orioles
Florida Marlins
Colorado Rockies
Arizona Diamondbacks
Toronto Blue Jays
New York Mets
Houston Astros
Seattle Mariners
San Francisco Giants
Boston Red Sox
Texas Rangers
New York Yankees
Los Angeles Angels
Chicago White Sox
Link1 comment|Vent your spleen

Picture Albums (Part I) [Mar. 28th, 2009|01:42 am]
The latest Facebook meme going around -- perhaps not the latest, exactly, as I am hardly on the cusp of these things and in any case by the time I am actually finished writing this there will be 14 other Latest Things -- is the commandment to "list 25 albums that changed your life."

Right away, this seems like a hyper-romantic and unusually ambitious exercise. Maybe I'm being too literal here, but are there really people out there who have had their lives changed 25 times? And each time by a record album? Are these the same socially manic people who enthusiastically extol the virtues of absorbent shammies on television infomercials and communicate their deeply-felt grievances in weekly letters to the editor of their local pennysaver?

Apparently not, because many of my otherwise well-adjusted friends have chimed in on this particular query with a disconcerting lack of irony. Or honesty, for that matter -- my money says that at least half of these people experienced monumentally life-altering heartmake or heartbreak to something like Richard Marx's "Repeat Offender," but you never see that on any of these top-25 lists. I mean, seriously. I don't even think the Clash sold that many albums.

As I've written before, there are certain songs that are intimately linked to particular people, places and things. (Incidentally, Marx's "Angelia" is one of them.) But truly transcendent, destiny-shaking, Hearing-the-Voice-of-God-type albums are far more rare in my personal catalogue. I can think of only three. Here's the first:

1. George Michael, Listen Without Prejudice, Volume I

In late 1990/early 1991 I was in the eighth grade, departing my lumpy adolescence and entering the full-blown Awkward Phase. Perhaps more than most 14 year old boys -- or perhaps simply no less than any 14-year old boy (an admittedly solipsistic lot) -- I was generously posessed of self-awareness and self-consciousness but lacking any sense of identity. My personality, such as it was, was little more than a loose conglomeration of involuntary tics, popular television programming, and peer pressure.

That peer pressure was applied by a relatively small social circle. I was an unattractive and anxious young man, qualities that effectively discouraged and in any case precluded interaction with girls, admired or not. So I held fast to a band of three boyhood chums, two of whom, it would turn out, were sociopathic assholes.

Of course, once I finally realized this and divested myself of their abusive brand of friendship, my social circle had shrunk to the point where you could fit its constituents in a mall photo booth. Feeling lost and more than a little lonely, I stumbled into a sort of purgatorial malaise.

Then I heard George Michael's Listen Without Prejudice, Volume I, sort of by accident. I actually bought the cassette for my mother, who was a feverish fan of his solo debut album, Faith. It's hard to remember this now, but in 1988 George Michael and Faith were galactic smash hits, spawning four number-one singles (plus a scandalous tune with the word "sex" in the title -- and which my mother initially tried to fast-forward through when we were in the car).

As it turns out, Listen Without Prejudice was an calculated departure from the Faith formula; it was a dark and deeply introspective meditation on truth and identity. My mother nonchalantly removed it from her rotation, but I eagerly made it a Walkman staple.

It spoke to me. I can still remember watching the world premiere of the video for the lead single, "Praying for Time". The video itself was a confrontationally minimalist approach that presaged his retirement from the sex symbol business and whispered "fuck you" to the MTV image factory (I don't think they ever played the video again). Reasonable people can disagree on what they think the song is "about" -- charity, justice, God -- but I always thought it was about survival: doing the best you can, trying to keep it together, holding on long enough to find the moments of joy scattered among the legion of frustrations.

On the dancier-but-still-brooding "Freedom '90," his voice seethed with anger and frustration at the mass media and the mass marketing that pigeonholed him as a rock star. (I know, poor guy, right? But apparently -- and I was oblivious to this at the time -- there is a lot of subtext here about his coming to terms with his sexual identity.) More conventionally, the song is all about the struggle between his personal and public persona. This dichotomy is probably too sophisticated to be fully appreciated by a mere teenager like me, but it nonetheless appealed to a guy who yearned to be seen as more than a neo-maxi-zoom dweebie.

His cover of the Stevie Wonder song "They Won't Go When I Go" was a dark trip through the looking glass, a decidedly un-George-Michaelish dirge about the pain of solitude and persecution. It's certainly melancholy and morose, which oughtn't appeal to anyone, much less a 14-year old. These lyrics in particular, from the song's bridge, haunted me:

Unclean minds mislead the pure
The innocent will leave for sure
For them there is a resting place

People sinning just for fun
They will never see the sun
For they can never show their faces

There ain't no room for
The hopeless sinner
Who will take more than he will give, he will give, he will give
He ain't hardly gonna give


I wasn't really sure then what it meant and I'm not sure that I do even yet. I just know that it made me feel better about telling those two assholes to go fuck themselves. And it made me feel better when they taunted me with religious epithets. And when they defaced my eighth grade yearbook with the most vile descriptions of unnatural acts.

The last song on the album is technically a reprise of an earlier song, but it has its own meter and its own message. It functions effectively as an epilogue, preaching patience and, not unironically, faith.

All those insecurities
that have held me down for so long
I can't say I've found a cure for these
But at least I know them, so they're not so strong

You look for your dreams in heaven
But what the hell are you supposed to do
When they come true?


For me, the "dream" was freedom and the challenge was -- as I grew more responsible for my own life -- living with my own choices. And in the most stark relief, that included getting rid of some of my "best friends" without much to fall back on.

This album found me at a low point, put me back on my feet and set me in the right direction. Within a year I had cleaned myself up, discovered my diversions, made a few friends and charmed a few ladies. I can't give all the credit to George Michael -- there are people out there reading this who certainly helped -- but I'm sure glad my mother wasn't a Michael Bolton fan.
Link1 comment|Vent your spleen

Just the fax, ma'am? [Feb. 22nd, 2009|07:11 pm]
"We've arranged a civilization in which most crucial elements profoundly depend on science and technology. We have also arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces."
- Carl Sagan


Dear Readers: I apologize for being so delinquent in my communication here. I sort-of promised that I would continue writing here sort-of weekly, and instead I have written here sort-of weakly.

The fact is that J. and I have, for the last several weeks, been neck-deep in negotiations to buy a home. Much of my waking time has lately been spent on realtors, agents, lenders, insurers, appraisers and other people with vague, imposing or disconcerting titles like "home service specialist" -- talking to them on the phone, trying to get them on the phone and worrying about not being able to get them on the phone.

The actual content of these conversations has been largely encouraging -- aside from the mere concept of spending, even in the abstract, what feels like the GDP of a small African nation -- we seemed to have timed the real estate and mortgage markets perfectly to get a good price (relative to the D.C. market) and a good rate.

But the process has its complications, and as the last one of my friends to join the home ownership revolution, I can't understand why I never heard anyone complain about it. I feel like I must be the most soft-shelled, unprepared and intemperate person to ever sign his name on a purchase agreement. I am stressed out to my limit, from my eyebrows to my toenails, and I don't ever remember anyone else whining like I am.

Chief among my frustrations is the real estate industrial complex's total reliance on the fax machine. The business infrastructure of these lending and title companies apparently dates back to the late 1980s, because they all need documents faxed to them. And we're not talking about one or two pages, either; I mean extensive, 30 or 40 page lawyerly documents, on legal-size paper.

To my knowledge, manufacturers stopped making fax machines before they even evolved to the point where they could handle such business tasks. These days, nobody owns their own personal fax machine, down from the 0.05 percent of the population that ever did (including my father, back in the day, when the digital facsimile images were manually punched by a pterodactyl). So of course it must be expected that people will either pay $10 a page to use a hotel business center or surreptitiously commandeer their office's fax machine during coffee breaks. My office's fax machine must have been a top-of-the-line piece of corporate weaponry back in 1993, but clearly has unresolved anxiety issues at any job involving more than a half-dozen clearly typewritten leaves.

Apparently, not everyone has entered the e-mail and attachment environment in which fully evolved people like you and I exist. Of course, there are translational "desktop fax services" out there, where such technologically enterprising people can scan their documents (if they're not already electronically encoded) and fax them to our neanderthal brethren via computer. But a casual audit of these services suggests that they cost $60+ on an annual basis, a steep price for temporary convenience.

I am more inclined to simply FedEx the damned papers and hope that the recipients get paper cuts.
Link2 comments|Vent your spleen

I was there when [Jan. 18th, 2009|11:36 am]
"History is merely gossip."
- Oscar Wilde


At least a quarter of all civilized humanity is apparently descending on Washington D.C. this weekend, gassed-up with neo-political enthusiasm over the swearing-in of a new president.

It is not enough that our new president is simply replacing the old one, whose term has been about as beneficial (and about as popular) as a staph infection. No, people everywhere want to be here to watch the changeover happen. Some folks have traveled thousands of miles to watch the new guy recite a thirty-second oath and give a 15-minute speech.

Oh, sure, there's some value in being "present," I suppose. Aside from the traditional social and cultural events that accompany such affairs, like inaugural balls, cocktail parties and the We Are One: Inaugural Concert to End All Inaugural Concerts, In Which Bono, Springsteen And Every Other Prominent Zeitgeist Troubadour With An Inflated Sense of Purpose Will Lead The Whole World In A Choir of Harmony And Peace, and Possibly "This Is Our Country," Making Us All Forget About Our Legion of National Troubles For Two Hours So We Can At Least Briefly Feel Good About Ourselves, Sponsored by HBO, there is also the predictable sense of synergy, in which the good spirits of all the participants combine to achieve an even greater sense of community.

It's intoxicating. I get that. I myself have felt it, in 1998 at Game One of the World Series in Yankee Stadium, when Tino Martinez hit a grand slam off of Mark Langston and the place erupted in volcanic euphoria -- I was caught up in the moment and I was rooting against the Yankees. And whenever anyone talks about that game, or that moment, I can say "I was there."

This seems to be a pretty significant motivator in our society: the ability to say "I was there when". There are a million people in this city literally saying, "I want to be able to say 'I was there when we inaugurated Barack Obama.'" Of course, when you stop and think about it, this compulsion is totally stupid.

Because, first of all, anyone can say it. "I was there when the Berlin Wall came down." See what I did? With minimal effort, I just made myself more interesting. Don't believe me? Prove me wrong. Think I'm lying? Here's the great part: at that point, it doesn't really matter if I'm lying, because there's no difference in being shallow enough to pretend like you actually had something to do with the Berlin Wall coming down and being shallow enough to lie about it. The truth is irrelevant.

Maybe 200 years ago, when news still traveled by horseback and mass communication was still an embryonic notion, first-person accounts were useful and interesting. But the 1998 World Series was seen on television and heard on the radio by millions of people. They know what happened. They where there, watching on their televisions, taking part in their own ways. I simply happened to be many miles closer. But it's not like I was divining any particular information from my seat in the upper deck, other than the fact that I thought it was going to collapse under the incessant stomping of 60,000 Yankee fans.

The phrase, even when weilded honestly and earnestly, is a meager commentary on character. After all, mere proximity does not necessarily imply anything other than good fortune, good connections or maybe, maybe the personal dedication it takes to forge a difficult journey. Ultimately, "I was there when" is little more than a way to insert oneself, however insignificantly, into a significant event. (If indeed it even is significant, which is usually a matter of opinion.) It's a very mild, generally acceptable form of self-aggrandizement. It's small-talk junk food.

Nevertheless, here everyone is, squeezing onto trains and trudging over bridges and carving out their own two square feet of grass in order to be a teeny-tiny itsy-bitsy part of "history." And yeah, I'll be out there too, given to a sense of obligation, experiencing the experience. But I'll be happier when it really is history.
Link5 comments|Vent your spleen

The Tale of the Hobo Umbrella [Jan. 6th, 2009|03:06 pm]
"The best thing one can do when it's raining is to let it rain."
- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow


So I was on the Metro today, minding my own business, absentmindedly nodding my head to the incessant beats of Fatboy Slim & Wildchild's "Renegade Master", when I noticed an umbrella just laying there on the floor.

Or, more accurately, an umbrella fragment. Its telescopic shaft was broken in half, the handle inexplicably missing, perhaps having rolled under a seat somewhere or holstered as a shiv. The umbrella part of the umbrella rested upside-down in full blossom, as if left to dry, though its structural integrity had been compromised; many of the thin aluminum girders were broken or bent out of shape, almost certainly rendering the umbrella practically unusable. The cheap black polyester webbing was tattered, frayed in spots and lightly stained with a mysterious crusty-looking brown substance.

This was the disabled homeless veteran of umbrellas.

At first I thought it belonged to one of my fellow riders, pressed into emergency service or even lately ravaged by the unexpectedly cold and wet morning weather, and could only be rested in its collapsed state. But the passengers nearest the item seemed to disavow it with their dismissive postures and sidelong glances; with each shuffle of the subway car their legs recoiled, as if avoiding an open syringe. One by one they departed the car, leaving it behind.

Someone had clearly abandoned this umbrella. And despite its obvious functional uselessness -- not to mention its hazardous position on the floor of a moving train -- nobody could be bothered to pick it up and dispose of it properly. Regretfully, at my stop, I declined to remove it myself. (I did not want to go near the crusty-looking brown stuff. I'm just getting over a cold.)

I left it, and it left me wondering: what will happen to it now. Maybe some good samaritan or sanitation worker will give it a proper burial, perhaps considering its long journey or perhaps not, while tossing it into a dumpster with the stray newspapers and food wrappers and other discarded rubbish. But what if nobody throws it away, and the train simply reaches the end of the line and turns back on a return journey, back and forth. Will it be there when I head home? Will it stay there forever? Is it stuck to the floor?

What if there are thousands of hobo umbrellas, used and discarded, riding trains back and forth every day? Once fresh and new, so full of utility and ready to brave the rain and sunshine, they are now consigned to this endlessly depressing coda.

It's almost enough to make me pray for precipitation.
LinkVent your spleen

Next [Jan. 1st, 2009|08:47 pm]
"I wish the world was flat like the old days
Then i could travel just by folding a map
No more airplanes, or speedtrains, or freeways
There'd be no distance that can hold us back"
- from "The New Year" by Death Cab for Cutie


On January 3, 2008, I resolved: "I will write. I will write regularly. I will write earnestly. I will write good well awesome."

I wrote regularly, anyway. Five days a week all year, with very few exceptions, I did my homework.

The grand object was to see if I was indeed a writer. Less abstractly, my goal was twofold: to get in the habit of writing every day and to build an archive of thoughts, stories and phrases upon which I could someday draw -- perhaps in the service of a more formal, ambitious literary effort.

Not only has this yearlong project been intensely educational, it has been spiritually gratifying. The encouragement from my readers -- particularly my extraordinarily dedicated family members -- helped sustain me throughout the year. Old, long-lost friends rose from the ashes of anecdotes and connected these days with the good old days. Ghosts and grudges that once haunted me were exorcised and rendered powerless.

It's been fun, but I've graduated. It's time to do something different. It's time to take this ethic and apply it toward something tangible -- and, if possible, something lucrative. That something could be a novel, or it could be a self-help book, or it could be a manifesto. Whatever it is will be offline.

But that doesn't mean I'm abandoning you, or this space. I'll try writing something here every week or so. There was a lot of stuff I meant to get to, but never had the chance: my List of Forbidden Words, my all-time favorite television shows (haiku style), an exclusive interview with the elusive Ms J. ... Have I talked yet about proper elevator etiquette? It probably deserves another mention.

I'll also try to keep you posted via my Twitter feed, handle EnchantedPants. Those of you who know me by my proper name can also find me on Facebook. [Sigh.]

Who knows, maybe I'll miss this particular grind and come back strong again soon. I doubt it, but you never know.

You only know this: I sincerely appreciate everyone who stopped by and propped me up. You all are the best. I look forward to your future support, assuming you remember who I am after this week.

Love.

E.P.


"And in the end
The love you take
Is equal to the love
You make."
- from "The End" by The Beatles
LinkVent your spleen

What are you doing new year's eve? [Dec. 31st, 2008|03:49 pm]
"I feel like one who treads alone
Some banquet hall deserted,
Whose lights are fled, whose garlands dead,
And all but he departed!"
- Thomas Moore


Valentine's Day gets all the publicity, but in my opinion New Year's Eve is the most insidiously romantic night of the year. While Valentine's Day is overt and demonstrative, New Year's Eve is sly and subversive. New Year's Eve inspires an unspoken but pervasive conflict between companionship and loneliness, brought into stark contrast by the end of one year and the beginning of another. The formal transition from one year to the next only seems arbitrary when you're not the person looking around for a hand to hold.

One of the most enduring New Year's Eve traditions is the kiss-at-midnight, a looming peer-pressurized moment in the year of any desperately single individual. This desperation has been known to manifest in all sorts of unhealthy ways, from ill-considered dates to impulsive late-night post-boozing Girls Gone Wild purchases.

The touchstone romantic comedy of this generation, When Harry Met Sally, features a climactic scene at a New Year's Eve party in Manhattan. "Harry" alludes to the evening's expectations when he intones, "it's not because I'm lonely, and it's not because it's New Year's Eve. I came here tonight because when you realize you want to spend the rest of your life with somebody, you want the rest of your life to start as soon as possible." This movie, for all its modern-day wisdom, gave misplaced hope to millions of guys who look like Billy Crystal that they could land a babe who looked like Meg Ryan, merely by invoking funny voices and glib observations.

The usual New Year's Eve dinner is custom-made for a romantic evening with one's partner. And is it merely coincidence that a single bottle of champagne is just the perfect size for two people to consume and metabolize in such a way as to encourage copulation. In fact, the whole New Year's Eve celebration is practically a choreographed fertility dance, designed to promote the propagation of the species.

For a long time, I didn't understand why the preeminent national symbol of the changing year was the dropping of the ball in New York's Times Square. I mean, what the hell? A ball dropping? If it's some kind of sports metaphor, it's egregiously stupid, since a dropped ball is almost universally a bad thing in any sport. And it's not even "dropping," really, it's more accurately "gently falling," like the "unnecessarily slow dipping mechanism" used to "kill" James Bond back in the "1960s."

But then I noticed the greater symbolism, working on any number of levels. The term "ball dropping" is itself often used to represent the descension of the male testes, evincing sexual maturity and readiness to engage in the physical act of love. Or perhaps the ball represents the female's egg, patienting inching toward fertilization, presaging the birth of a new year. More brazenly, we need only watch how the long, cylindrical shaft slowly penetrates the round, swollen sphere until the moment when it is completely consumed, at which point the whole thing lights up, fireworks go off and everyone screams with passionate delight. It's so obviously dirty, in fact, that it's sort of surprising they show it on broadcast television.

Alas, I am too sick to dine and party with my loved one this year. But the notion still holds strong: I pass into 2009 flush with the pride and confidence that comes with having J. to kiss every night. With her, every night is like New Year's Eve, only without the hangover the following day.
LinkVent your spleen

Sick in the Head [Dec. 30th, 2008|03:25 pm]
"Razors pain you
Rivers are damp
Acid stains you
Drugs cause cramp
Guns aren't lawful
Nooses give
Gas smells awful
You might as well live."
- Dorothy Parker


The signs are all here: Mild sinus congestion and inflammation. Scratchy, tender throat. Vague, indeterminate soreness. Sudden dental sensitivity. Persistent sense of foreboding. I'm getting a head cold.

Not ideal timing, considering that tomorrow night is New Year's Eve, one of few established, national occasions in which conspicuous consumption and reckless abandon are not only expected but encouraged. But I am concerned that by the time the clock strikes midnight, I will be slathered with Vicks Vapo-Rub and wheezing into my pillow.

It could be worse, I suppose. I could have come down with this cold before my Vegas Vacation[1] and spent my Quality Family Time inadvertently flinging mucus at my immediate family. In fact, the unseasonably cold weather in the American southwest may be partially to blame for my ague, as more than once I impulsively braved nearly-freezing temperatures in mere shirtsleeves. Repeated contact with filthy gaming machines, undersanitized hotel linens and germ-encrusted airline equipment could not have helped, either.

I have been coming down with colds since before I was old enough to wipe my own nose and still I'm not sure how to proceed, particularly at this particular stage of illness. Should I rage against the infection, trying to slow its determined advance and perhaps break its will? Or should I embrace the sickness, wallow in it for a while, and let my immune system quickly and quietly do its work?

"Rest" is often prescribed as a sure-fire cure for what ails me, but I'm not sure if this means "sleep" or just a lack of exertion. Sleep doesn't really make any sense, because if I sleep when I'm usually awake, it generally means that I'll be awake when I'm usually asleep. And if I'm going to be awake and bored and fussy, I'd rather do so in the company of other awake people. It would be pretty frustrating for me to lie awake thinking about my deviated septum with J. laying next to me, dreaming about cheesecake.

Rest as in non-exertion sounds fine, especially if it means I can stay home from work.[2] But what does that really entail that's different from my usual non-work hours? More television and whining? Does it get me out of minor household chores? What's the policy on really deep, analytical thinking?

Often I will feel better after going to the gym. I'm not sure if that's because it splits my focus or improves my circulation or pumps up my endorphins or what. But it usually helps. Then again, I'm not sure that the best thing for me to do while sick is break out into a profuse sweat.

I will have to be particularly vigilant with regard to a love quarantine; it would be very bad for me to get J. sick at this time, as she is trying to wrap up one job this week and starting a new job next week. It has long been my philosophy that if someone can love you when you are sick -- and infectious and sloppy and ugly and irritable -- then that person really loves you. But in this case, love comes with a hazmat suit.

The only halfway good thing about a head cold is that it usually eventually becomes a chest cold, making it that much easier to do my Kathleen Turner impression. :et us hope it goes no farther south, though, lest I be forced to do my diptheria impression.
Link2 comments|Vent your spleen

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]

Advertisement